El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square

El Salvador
1.21 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
1.25 units per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
45th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.511.52197019962023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.25 units per square kilometre against 1.21 units per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.04 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1985 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 45th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 183 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.4595 units per square kilometre 0.5625 units per square kilometre 0.103 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.8851 units per square kilometre 0.7917 units per square kilometre 0.0935 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 1.16 units per square kilometre 1.27 units per square kilometre 0.1119 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.3 units per square kilometre 0.4865 units per square kilometre 0.8144 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.8341 units per square kilometre 0.8208 units per square kilometre 0.0132 units per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square, El Salvador or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.25 units per square kilometre against 1.21 units per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square between El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.04 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square?
El Salvador ranks 45th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-registered-carrier-departures-worldwide-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-registered-carrier-departures-worldwide-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sao-tome-and-principe/">El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,074 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.