Barbados vs Mali: Air transport, passengers carried, per unit of GDP
Barbados
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 1991
Mali
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2014
Barbados rank
180th
Mali rank
180th
Air transport, passengers carried, per unit of GDP over time
- Barbados
- Mali
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Mali, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Mali ahead.
Barbados ranks 180th and Mali ranks 180th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Barbados |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher air transport, passengers carried, per unit of gdp, Barbados or Mali?
- Barbados, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Mali as of 1991.
- What is the difference in air transport, passengers carried, per unit of gdp between Barbados and Mali?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mali?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1987.
- How do Barbados and Mali rank globally for air transport, passengers carried, per unit of gdp?
- Barbados ranks 180th and Mali ranks 180th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, passengers carried, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Air transport, passengers carried divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.