Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Korea: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
26.45 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea
781.48 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
16th
Korea rank
13th

Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Korea
02004006008001.0k197019962023

How they compare

Korea currently reports 781.48 units per square kilometre against 26.45 units per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 755.03 units per square kilometre.

That makes Korea's figure about 29.5 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 16th and Korea ranks 13th of 44 groups.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 2.9 units per square kilometre 287.63 units per square kilometre 284.73 units per square kilometre Korea
2000s 4.82 units per square kilometre 357.72 units per square kilometre 352.91 units per square kilometre Korea
2010s 18.49 units per square kilometre 652.7 units per square kilometre 634.21 units per square kilometre Korea
2020s 18.24 units per square kilometre 479.45 units per square kilometre 461.22 units per square kilometre Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Korea?
Korea, at 781.48 units per square kilometre against 26.45 units per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Korea?
755.03 units per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Korea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Korea rank globally for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 16th and Korea ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Korea: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/korea-rep/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Korea: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,079 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.