Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre

Côte d'Ivoire
2.25 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.16 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
132nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
133rd

Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.511.522.5197019962023

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 2.25 units per square kilometre against 2.16 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.09 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 132nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 133rd of 183 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2875 units per square kilometre 0.2538 units per square kilometre 0.0337 units per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 0.836 units per square kilometre 0.4566 units per square kilometre 0.3794 units per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1990s 0.5815 units per square kilometre 0.2568 units per square kilometre 0.3247 units per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2000s 0.2427 units per square kilometre 0.2075 units per square kilometre 0.0352 units per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 1.51 units per square kilometre 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.1685 units per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2020s 1.75 units per square kilometre 1.61 units per square kilometre 0.1402 units per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre, Côte d'Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 2.25 units per square kilometre against 2.16 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre between Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.09 units per square kilometre, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
46 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 132nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,079 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.