Belgium vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre

Belgium
373.54 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
22.67 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
23rd
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
20th

Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
0100200300400500197019962023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 373.54 units per square kilometre against 22.67 units per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 350.87 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 16.5 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 23rd and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 20th of 183 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 163.3 units per square kilometre 6.17 units per square kilometre 157.13 units per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 366.59 units per square kilometre 17.65 units per square kilometre 348.95 units per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 249.9 units per square kilometre 14.27 units per square kilometre 235.63 units per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre, Belgium or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
Belgium, at 373.54 units per square kilometre against 22.67 units per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre between Belgium and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
350.87 units per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank globally for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 23rd and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 20th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/belgium/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/belgium/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/">Belgium vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,079 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.