Japan vs Upper middle income: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre

Japan
0.0232 million ton-km per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income
0.0011 million ton-km per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
17th
Upper middle income rank
15th

Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Upper middle income
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.0232 million ton-km per square kilometre against 0.0011 million ton-km per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 0.0221 million ton-km per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 21.4 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 17th and Upper middle income ranks 15th of 180 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0031 million ton-km per square kilometre 0 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.003 million ton-km per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.0089 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0001 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0088 million ton-km per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.0174 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0002 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0172 million ton-km per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.0235 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0004 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0231 million ton-km per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.0232 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0008 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0224 million ton-km per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.0253 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0009 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0244 million ton-km per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre, Japan or Upper middle income?
Japan, at 0.0232 million ton-km per square kilometre against 0.0011 million ton-km per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre between Japan and Upper middle income?
0.0221 million ton-km per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Upper middle income?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Japan and Upper middle income rank globally for air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 17th and Upper middle income ranks 15th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Upper middle income: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-freight-million-ton-km-per-square-kilometre/japan/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-freight-million-ton-km-per-square-kilometre/japan/upper-middle-income/">Japan vs Upper middle income: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre
Unit
million ton-km per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,642 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, freight (million ton-km) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.