Iceland vs Philippines: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre

Iceland
0.0019 million ton-km per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
0.0022 million ton-km per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
49th
Philippines rank
46th

Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Philippines
00.0010.0020.003197019962023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.0022 million ton-km per square kilometre against 0.0019 million ton-km per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0003 million ton-km per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 46th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0003 million ton-km per square kilometre 0 million ton-km per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 0.0002 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0008 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0005 million ton-km per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 0.0004 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0011 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0007 million ton-km per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 0.0011 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.001 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0002 million ton-km per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0012 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0021 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0009 million ton-km per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 0.0015 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0018 million ton-km per square kilometre 0.0003 million ton-km per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre, Iceland or Philippines?
Philippines, at 0.0022 million ton-km per square kilometre against 0.0019 million ton-km per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre between Iceland and Philippines?
0.0003 million ton-km per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Philippines?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Philippines rank globally for air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 46th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Philippines: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-freight-million-ton-km-per-square-kilometre/iceland/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-freight-million-ton-km-per-square-kilometre/iceland/philippines/">Iceland vs Philippines: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per square kilometre
Unit
million ton-km per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,642 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, freight (million ton-km) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.