Latvia vs Uruguay: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per capita
Latvia
0 million ton-km per person
in 2023
Uruguay
0 million ton-km per person
in 2009
Latvia rank
97th
Uruguay rank
100th
Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per capita over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 million ton-km per person against 0 million ton-km per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 million ton-km per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Latvia ranks 97th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 million ton-km per person | 0 million ton-km per person | 0 million ton-km per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 million ton-km per person | 0 million ton-km per person | 0 million ton-km per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher air transport, freight (million ton-km), per capita, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Latvia, at 0 million ton-km per person against 0 million ton-km per person in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in air transport, freight (million ton-km), per capita between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 0 million ton-km per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for air transport, freight (million ton-km), per capita?
- Latvia ranks 97th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Air transport, freight (million ton-km) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.